kibaxx7
× Start Spreading the News × ⁽ᵃ ᵏⁿᶦᶜᵏˢ ˢᵗᵒʳʸ⁾ - https://dynastysports.net/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=1402
× The Life and Times of Tanjiro Sakai × ʳᵉᵈᵘˣ - https://dynastysports.net/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=1376
× A New Horizon | Arsenal FC × - https://dynastysports.net/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=1304
× The Life and Times (v1) × - https://dynastysports.net/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=1266
James
Grind and Glory - https://dynastysports.net/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1330
Birds on the Bat | MLB 23 - https://dynastysports.net/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=1225
SCORE OUT OF 50
Voting Categories:
Chises should be evaluated on the following metrics. Each category is worth 10 points and will provide a final score of 50.
1. Engagement and Activity
Replies & Views: Threads with high reply counts and many views often indicate strong engagement.
Consistency: A well-maintained dynasty that gets regular updates (not just a few posts and then abandoned).
Reader Interaction: Look for threads where users comment, ask questions, and provide feedback.
2. Presentation & Writing Quality
Detail & Storytelling: Does the author just list stats and scores, or do they add depth (e.g., game recaps, player spotlights, press conference write-ups, or backstories)?
Formatting & Readability: Threads with bold headers, images, box scores, and clear layouts tend to be more engaging.
Graphics & Visuals: Some users include screenshots, custom graphics, tables, or video highlights.
3. Realism & Immersion
Believability: Does the dynasty feel realistic, or does the user make unrealistic trades/signings that break immersion?
Depth: Is the user just playing games, or do they manage rosters, recruit, handle contracts, and discuss strategies?
Narrative & Role-Playing: Some threads go beyond stats and include coaching interviews, media articles, or locker room drama.
4. Longevity & Completion
Multiple Seasons: Some of the best dynasties span multiple in-game years, showing long-term progression.
Thread Lifespan: Older threads with consistent updates over months or years often become community favorites.
5. Uniqueness & Creativity
Challenging Scenarios: Is it a rebuild of a struggling team or a custom league with fictional teams?
Creative Rules or Restrictions: Some users create house rules to avoid cheesing the game (e.g., no manual trades, only using certain recruiting pipelines).
Custom Stories: Unique elements like coach-created personas, backstories, or alternative history setups add flavor.
Voters can post just a number and/or a number with feedback. The user should be evaluated in comparison to their opponent, meaning a score could be different from round to round.
Sweet Sixteen: kibaxxx7 vs. James
Sweet Sixteen: kibaxxx7 vs. James
kibaxx7
1. Engagement and Activity: 7/10
2. Presentation & Writing Quality: 9/10
3. Realism & Immersion: 9/10
4. Longevity & Completion: 6/10
5. Uniqueness & Creativity: 9/10
Total: 40/50
James
1. Engagement and Activity: 9/10
2. Presentation & Writing Quality: 8/10
3. Realism & Immersion: 8/10
4. Longevity & Completion: 9/10
5. Uniqueness & Creativity: 7/10
Total: 41/50
1. Engagement and Activity: 7/10
2. Presentation & Writing Quality: 9/10
3. Realism & Immersion: 9/10
4. Longevity & Completion: 6/10
5. Uniqueness & Creativity: 9/10
Total: 40/50
James
1. Engagement and Activity: 9/10
2. Presentation & Writing Quality: 8/10
3. Realism & Immersion: 8/10
4. Longevity & Completion: 9/10
5. Uniqueness & Creativity: 7/10
Total: 41/50
Last edited by The JZA on 04 Mar 2025, 09:30, edited 1 time in total.
Sweet Sixteen: kibaxxx7 vs. James
kibaxx7
1. Engagement and Activity: 9/10
2. Presentation & Writing Quality: 10/10
3. Realism & Immersion: 9/10
4. Longevity & Completion: 9/10
5. Uniqueness & Creativity: 10/10
Total: 47/50
James
1. Engagement and Activity: 10/10
2. Presentation & Writing Quality: 9/10
3. Realism & Immersion: 9/10
4. Longevity & Completion: 10/10
5. Uniqueness & Creativity: 9/10
Total: 47/50
didn't expect this one to be as close as it is head to head. James wins in engagement & longevity while Kibaxx wins for writing quality (man grinds his chises with very informative text) which as a result earns him the nod in uniqueness/creativity from me as well. Same as JZA & Caes, I had to give both of these fellas a 9 because they're equally as realistic to me as can be. kibaxx absolutely stays within the lines of realism & who's the say the Birds on the Bat ain't batting?!
After I did my scoring, I said, wait... did they just tie?? Majority draw from me. 47/50. Good job fellas. May the best man win.
1. Engagement and Activity: 9/10
2. Presentation & Writing Quality: 10/10
3. Realism & Immersion: 9/10
4. Longevity & Completion: 9/10
5. Uniqueness & Creativity: 10/10
Total: 47/50
James
1. Engagement and Activity: 10/10
2. Presentation & Writing Quality: 9/10
3. Realism & Immersion: 9/10
4. Longevity & Completion: 10/10
5. Uniqueness & Creativity: 9/10
Total: 47/50

After I did my scoring, I said, wait... did they just tie?? Majority draw from me. 47/50. Good job fellas. May the best man win.
Sweet Sixteen: kibaxxx7 vs. James
kibaxx7
1. Engagement and Activity: 7/10
2. Presentation & Writing Quality: 7/10
3. Realism & Immersion: 6/10
4. Longevity & Completion: 6/10
5. Uniqueness & Creativity: 8/10
Total: 34/50
James
1. Engagement and Activity: 7/10
2. Presentation & Writing Quality: 7/10
3. Realism & Immersion: 8/10
4. Longevity & Completion: 7/10
5. Uniqueness & Creativity: 7/10
Total: 36/50
1. Engagement and Activity: 7/10
2. Presentation & Writing Quality: 7/10
3. Realism & Immersion: 6/10
4. Longevity & Completion: 6/10
5. Uniqueness & Creativity: 8/10
Total: 34/50
James
1. Engagement and Activity: 7/10
2. Presentation & Writing Quality: 7/10
3. Realism & Immersion: 8/10
4. Longevity & Completion: 7/10
5. Uniqueness & Creativity: 7/10
Total: 36/50
Sweet Sixteen: kibaxxx7 vs. James
Category/Chiser | Kibaxxx7 | James | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Engagement/Activity | 5 | 7 | Haven't seen Kibaxxx7 around much lately, James is one of the most active dudes around. |
Presentation/Writing Quality | 7 | 7 | Different presentation styles, both good. |
Realism/Immersion | 6 | 6 | No notable realism violations, both know how to get you interested. |
Longevity/Completion | 5 | 8 | Kibaxx7 had some longevity going but seems to have pulled the plug there. James has multiple seasons in CFB and in MLB. Impressive. |
Uniqueness/Creativity | 8 | 8 | Kibaxxx7 with the retro chises, created characters. James created coach with a back story, made an audio podcast. Definitely unique ideas from both. |
TOTALS | 31 | 36 | James takes a somewhat close win, would love to see more from Kibaxxx7 with the retro stuff especially. |
Sweet Sixteen: kibaxxx7 vs. James
kibaxx7
1. Engagement and Activity: 5/10
2. Presentation & Writing Quality: 7/10
3. Realism & Immersion: 6/10
4. Longevity & Completion: 5/10
5. Uniqueness & Creativity: 8/10
Total: 31/50
James
1. Engagement and Activity: 7/10
2. Presentation & Writing Quality: 7/10
3. Realism & Immersion: 8/10
4. Longevity & Completion: 8/10
5. Uniqueness & Creativity: 7/10
Total: 37/50
1. Engagement and Activity: 5/10
2. Presentation & Writing Quality: 7/10
3. Realism & Immersion: 6/10
4. Longevity & Completion: 5/10
5. Uniqueness & Creativity: 8/10
Total: 31/50
James
1. Engagement and Activity: 7/10
2. Presentation & Writing Quality: 7/10
3. Realism & Immersion: 8/10
4. Longevity & Completion: 8/10
5. Uniqueness & Creativity: 7/10
Total: 37/50
Sweet Sixteen: kibaxxx7 vs. James
James - 197
kibaxx7 - 183
James advances.
kibaxx7 - 183
James advances.